The René Collier Diaries

A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst future neighbours in excess of the construction of a wall at a coastal website within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which has attracted national attention following an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed spouse and children property at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of planning breaches, environmental worries, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Times short article about René Collier as well as the Irish Occasions post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has advanced into a extremely publicised authorized struggle.

Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction performs at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, look for to construct their family members property. The case is now emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where progress pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized residents. In accordance with the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being built by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted below arranging authorization.

René Collier and Paul Feely, both residents of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their organizing permission by creating a wall further than the boundaries in their site, leading to an encroachment with a Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result places are subject matter to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly inside of a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.

Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially created, is in the correct position. Their lawful team has characterised the action being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding as a way to maintain their check out, an allegation that has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, the place views of the sea are the two hugely prized and hotly contested.

The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable efforts from the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-high h2o through a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances, an image which includes considering that turn into emblematic from the depth in the dispute. These steps were not merely symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof in the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.

Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location through the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two men entered the drinking water through significant weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm h2o to photograph the location became Among the most striking descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these types of actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.

The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately from the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as readers sought to grasp the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court heard even further submissions on regardless of whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical moment from the authorized timeline.

At the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was accepted and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and conditions hooked up for the permission.

Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting instead that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have explained their extended-standing relationship to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.

On one other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply seeking to develop a spouse and children household in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Location of Conservation and say that every one operates are actually carried out determined by Experienced guidance and accredited plans. Their lawyers have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, never alter the fundamental facts.

The case has also elevated broader questions on how planning disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute about design of wall at coastal website is becoming a shorthand description for the condition a large number of observers see as increasingly common. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now far more contentious.

The Irish Instances post about René Collier noted which the businessman had Beforehand been involved with nearby advocacy on planning and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty distinct professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.

Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location through the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of waistline-high water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by way René Collier of waistline-substantial drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting each the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic mother nature with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an abnormal tactic.

As the High Court proceedings keep on, the outcome remains uncertain. The court should decide whether the wall as constructed complies with organizing permission and no matter if any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up problems. Nevertheless the human component remains central: neighbours who will have to Stay along with one another very long following the lawful expenditures are already compensated.

Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about construction works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase over and above that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental security and home rights are perceived to generally be at stake.

In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays an area of all-natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.